Moving Microphone Closer to SourceIt is sometimes hard to convince a performer that one should move closer to the microphone rather than farther away if the system rings from feedback. Moving the source closer to the microphone and decreasing the amplification improves the chances of getting an adequate sound signal to the listener. The improvements obtainable by close-miking can be modeled fairly accurately from the simplified amplification system because the source is typically close enough for the microphone to be in the direct sound field where the inverse square law holds. When the performer doubles the distance to the microphone, their signal into the microphone drops by 6 decibels while the input from reverberant sound and noises in the auditorium do not change appreciably. Therefore holding the microphone closer not only strengthens the signal to the microphone but also increases the signal-to-noise ratio and the potential acoustic gain.
|
Index Sound reproduction concepts | ||
|
Go Back |
Moving Source Closer to ListenerThe fact that the source-to-listener distance D0 appears in the expression for potential acoustic gain just practically factors in the size of the auditorium into the system design. In the P.A.G calculation the most meaningful value for D0 is usually that to the most distant listener. Varying D0 in that calculation is not particularly useful - if you decreased D0 by a factor of 2 without changing the other parameters, you would find that the P.A.G. decreases by 6dB. But since that point is half the distance from the source, the unamplified sound is 6dB higher so it doesn't represent an actual loss of sound intensity. Varying D0 for systems with multiple speakers might help model their contributions. You would like to get about the same sound level to all listeners. If the sound is brought up to an ideal level at the back of the auditorium, it may be too loud for those who are closer. Sometimes this problem is addressed by using a high central cluster speaker which has horn-type speakers with a more directional pattern than ordinary cone-type loudspeakers. If the horn is pointed toward the distant listeners, then the drop-off of the sound off-axis can keep the amplified sound from being excessive for the closer listeners.
|
Index Sound reproduction concepts | ||
|
Go Back |
Using More Directional Microphones
Higher gain can be obtained with unidirectional microphones, but it is more difficult the keep the narrow microphone pattern centered on the source.
|
Index Sound reproduction concepts | ||||
|
Go Back |
Using More Directional LoudspeakersDirectionality in both microphones and loudspeakers can be used to advantage to increase the potential acoustic gain. It is more difficult to get narrow directional patterns with loudspeakers, but various types of horn loudspeakers achieve signigicant increases in useful gain plus the reduction of echoes and a more uniform sound level over the audience. Another approach is to use a vertical column of loudspeakers to spread sound in the horizontal plane, achieving some directionality.
|
Index Sound reproduction concepts | ||
|
Go Back |
Notch FiltersWhen a non-uniform frequency response of an amplification system/room combination causes the system to "ring" before giving adequate amplification, the potential acoustic gain can sometimes be improved with the use of notch filters to take out the offending frequencies as illustrated below. Shown is the use of two notch filters to discriminate against the two most prominent peaks in the frequency response. Often several such tunable notch filters are packaged together and marketed as "feedback suppressors" . Sometimes such feedback suppressors are used to smooth out the roughest spots before undertaking a full-fledged equalization of the sound system.
|
Index Sound reproduction concepts | ||
|
Go Back |