Fossil DistributionOne of the first lines of evidence suggesting the existence of plate tectonics was the discovery of very similar fossils in rock masses separated by vast distances and by ocean expanses. It suggested that those land areas had in the past been connected.
|
Index Geophysics concepts | ||
|
Go Back |
Coastline MatchingThe similarity of coastlines for different continents suggests that they may once have been connected. But the fact that they were separated by sometimes thousands of miles suggested continental drift or plate tectonics . Taylor, the earliest proponent of plate tectonics, argued partly on the basis of the coastline matching of eastern South America and western Africa. His case was weakened by obvious areas of mismatch, but then it was realized that matching the continental shelves around these continents was the key test of matching. Erosion could significantly affect the coastline geometry. Once careful mapping of those continental shelves was accomplished, the match between these coasts was impressive. The illustration above follows Lutgens & Tarbuck, who give credit for the detailed mapping to A. G. Smith.
|
Index Reference Lutgens and Tarbuck Ch 16 | ||
|
Go Back |
PaleomagnetismStudies of the magnetic field orientations in rock strata reinforced the case for plate tectonics.
The magnetic field at any point on the Earth would orient a compass in the direction of magnetic North. The compass needle is a mobile magnet that rotates to align with the magntic field. Measurement of the magnetic field direction at a point on the Earth could tell you where the magnetic North pole is at that time, but you would have to measure the dip angle as well as the direction parallel to the surface to imply the pole location. The illustration below follows the treatment of Lutgens and Tarbuck who trace the evidence for plate tectonics that comes from the study of the magnetization of minerals. Studies of lava flows in Europe during the 1950s and later in North America showed a change in the orientation of the magnetic field with the age of the lava. This was taken as evidence that the magnetic poles "wandered" over the surface of the Earth. But given the stability of the Earth's rotation axis and it's association with the magnetic field generation as discussed above, it seems more likely that the land mass itself had "wandered", i.e., undergone plate tectonic movement. A problem arose with the comparison of the Eurasian and North American studies, since they showed different paths for the "pole wandering". But it was found that if you migrated the North American continent over toward the African continent, the curves came into congruence. The "problem" of different pole wandering paths became powerful evidence that the continents themselves had changed their relative positions in comparison to a presumably almost stationary magnetic pole.
|
Index Reference Lutgens and Tarbuck Ch 16 | |||||
|
Go Back |